Fractional CTO services for non-technical founders.

Ongoing technical leadership for founders who do not write code. We make the roadmap calls with you, manage developers and vendors, and review the code, with authority and deliverables agreed up front.

What a fractional CTO does for a non-technical founder

A fractional CTO gives you technical leadership on a defined, part-time basis. The job ties together what the product needs next, the engineering decisions behind it, what your team can handle and what could go wrong once it is live. You should end up better informed, and the people doing the work should know who is responsible for what.

How much authority the role carries depends on the agreement. Advising you on a hire is a different job from managing that person, and reviewing a release is a different job from approving changes to production. We set those boundaries with you so the title does not leave anyone unsure who is accountable.

Fractional CTO, developer, adviser or technical co-founder?

A developer builds the product you agreed on. A technical adviser may weigh in now and then on a narrow set of questions. A fractional CTO takes on a continuing leadership remit. A technical co-founder is a separate company relationship, and it comes with commitments that a service engagement does not automatically include.

Choose the responsibility you need

Role
Implementation team
Primary need
Build a defined product or repair
A useful deliverable
Working, verified software
Role
Independent reviewer
Primary need
Understand an existing product or proposal
A useful deliverable
A bounded written assessment
Role
Fractional CTO
Primary need
Make and oversee ongoing technical decisions
A useful deliverable
Roadmap, decision records and delivery oversight
Role
Full-time technical leader
Primary need
Continuous company-wide executive responsibility
A useful deliverable
A role and authority matched to the company stage

What ongoing technical leadership does each week

Turn a feature list into a roadmap with reasons

A roadmap should say which customer or business outcome each priority supports. It also has to cover the work that keeps the product operable: permissions, data quality, releases and support. If that work stays hidden until a launch or a customer review, it costs more to deal with then.

We ask what is blocking the next business outcome and what evidence would settle the open question. The answer might be more building, a test with customers or a review of a component you already have. Once the question has a name, your team is less likely to spend weeks building around a decision nobody has made.

Review developers and vendors through working evidence

Vendor oversight means checking reported progress against a usable product. A pull request shows that development happened, but it does not prove the change reached production or that a customer can finish the journey. We agree on the demonstrations and records that let you see the gap.

Hiring work can include clarifying the role, reviewing technical evidence and helping you assess candidates against the job. The aim is to find the capability your business needs, which an impressive title or a fashionable technology on the team will not tell you.

What the first phase should deliver

If you already have a product, the first phase finds out where things stand: the code, the delivery process, team responsibilities and account ownership. If the business is new, it covers the customer journey, the build choices and the team you need for the first release. How often we meet follows from those needs.

  • A written current-state assessment and a prioritized set of technical decisions.
  • A roadmap linked to business outcomes and explicit assumptions.
  • A responsibility map for scope, spending, access and release approvals.
  • A review cadence with recorded decisions, risks and follow-up owners.
  • A plan for documentation and a future handover to the next team or leader.

What affects fractional CTO cost and the ongoing engagement?

The price depends on the responsibility, availability and work included. Do not compare a quote for an advisory role made up of meetings directly with one for hands-on delivery leadership. Ask whether code review, hiring support, help during incidents and implementation are included or scoped separately.

The engagement should get more useful as we learn the product and the business. Check whether decisions are clearer, whether the team can demonstrate progress and whether you can see the risks behind a recommendation. Agree on a review point and a handover process so your company does not depend on one outside person to explain its own product.

PONO.AI product interface built by Twin Designs & Tech

From our work / PONO.AI

The published PONO.AI story describes platform architecture, connected automation and an ongoing product partnership. It demonstrates the context behind TDAT’s approach to leadership across product and implementation.

Read the PONO.AI case study

Before you hire a fractional CTO

Turn the title into responsibilities you can evaluate.

  1. Which decisions will you own, recommend or review?
  2. What work and account access are needed to make those decisions responsibly?
  3. What written deliverables and review cadence will I receive?
  4. How do you handle a disagreement with my development vendor?
  5. What is excluded, and how will you hand the role to a future internal leader?
How we can help

We can be your fractional CTO.

We can lead the technical decisions your business needs to make. We turn priorities into a reasoned roadmap, review the evidence behind developer and vendor updates, and support the hiring and code reviews included in your engagement. You get written decisions, named responsibilities and a review cadence agreed with your team.

Book a free consultation

On the project call, we’ll discuss the problem, your existing tools and what TDAT should take off your hands. Then we can define the scope and next steps.

Or call (919) 289-1231

Questions before we start

Is a fractional CTO a technical co-founder for hire?

No. You get technical leadership under a contract. Co-founder status, equity and company officer responsibilities are separate arrangements, and the service does not imply any of them.

Can you work with my existing developers?

Yes. We can set up a leadership and review role alongside your existing team, and we agree who has what authority and who delivers what.

Can I start with an audit instead of a retainer?

Yes. If what you mainly want to know is the state of the product, a bounded Diagnostic may be the more useful place to start.

Do you also build the product?

We can scope implementation where it makes sense. The agreement spells out which deliverables are ongoing leadership and which are hands-on development.

How will I know the engagement is useful?

Agree on the decisions, written outputs and review points in advance. Then judge the engagement by whether priorities, ownership and progress have become clearer, since a count of meetings will not tell you that.